Spotlight on: Research Organization Registry (ROR)

The judges have selected a shortlist of four for the 2024 ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing. This year's awards are sponsored by PA EDitorial.

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning session at the ALPSP Conference on 11 September. The winners will be announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 12 September in Manchester.

In this series, we hear from each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

Fun fact: ROR itself is not an organization! It is an initiative jointly operated by California Digital Library, Crossref, and DataCite – three organizations with deep ties to the publishing, research, infrastructure, and library communities that represent ROR’s key stakeholder constituencies. The three operating organizations share the responsibilities of resourcing and governing ROR per a multi-year Memorandum of Agreement first executed in 2020. As an initiative that first emerged through a series of meetings and collaborations beginning in 2016, ROR is committed to incorporating and addressing the input and needs of its global user base. Our operations and activities aim to be transparent and participatory. We hold open community meetings every other month to discuss plans and share progress, actively solicit feedback on product development decisions, and post about our processes publicly on GitHub and other channels so that everyone can see and contribute to what we are working on.

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards?

We submitted our proposal for the ROR registry, which encompasses the dataset itself (unique persistent identifiers and associated metadata for research and funding organizations), an accompanying suite of tools for querying, integrating, and matching ROR data, and a comprehensive and responsive process for curating registry data and releasing regular updates. 

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

ROR addresses a complex problem with a simple solution. Before ROR, there was no free, open, and reliable way to identify and connect the institutions that employ and fund researchers to the works those researchers produce. Some identification solutions did (and still) exist, but these were proprietary services that only certain users could afford, not fully open for global usage by humans and machines and interoperability across systems, or not tailored to specific research and publishing use cases. The niche that ROR fills is to provide a single, well-scoped, open dataset that can be used in any system to normalize and exchange information about institutions and make it easy and more efficient to identify and track research activities at the institutional level. Data is publicly available for anyone to query and integrate, and we release new registry updates every month so integrators can grab the latest additions and changes. We actively add new records and modify existing ones to ensure registry data is comprehensive and up to date, and to provide as much metadata as possible to support discovery and disambiguation. There is no cost to submit updates to the registry, and no cost to use the data. Integrators build organization lookups and other implementations to normalize institutional names in their systems, and they can provide ROR IDs to metadata sources like Crossref, DataCite, and ORCID, which enables more precise reporting and tracking of research outputs in the downstream systems that rely on these metadata sources. 

As for the people behind ROR: we are a small and nimble team based across ROR’s three operating organizations, which means that in addition to supporting day-to-day work on ROR, we support and are connected to the activities and wider communities that our organizations are engaged with. There is more to ROR than the team, however: we are also fortunate to have an active and engaged network of supporters and advisors who provide important guidance and input on our development work, metadata curation processes, and strategic directions. 

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

ROR is not the first or only organization identifier, but it is unique and innovative because it is the only one that is completely free and open, specifically designed for research workflows and research infrastructure, uniquely suited to address a range of use cases, recommended in national persistent identifier strategies, and developed as a community-driven initiative. It’s a single, streamlined, and powerful service that can help make everyone’s metadata cleaner and more connected. 

What are your plans for the future?

This is an exciting time for ROR’s growth as we are seeing greater adoption in systems and services around the world to address a range of use cases. We continue to actively maintain registry data for quality and completeness as more and more users depend on it, and we are investing in scaling our workflows and infrastructure to support increased demand - the API, for instance, regularly sees 20 million requests every month. With rising adoption as well as growing interest overall in greater metadata connectivity through persistent identifiers, we are seeing an increased role for ROR to play in helping to manage, clean up, and connect massive volumes of legacy data, so we’re fine-tuning our API to leverage machine-learning technologies in support of large-scale matching and reconciliation. With the forthcoming deprecation of Crossref’s Open Funder Registry, we’re also completing our work to map Funder IDs to ROR and continuing to engage with funders and other stakeholders to support them through this transition. 

Example record from search UI:

Example ROR-powered typeahead lookup for affiliation and funding information:

About the author

ROR Director Maria Gould has led the initiative since 2018. She is also Director of Product at DataCite.  

More information

Research Organization Registry (ROR).

Spotlight on: Signals

The judges have selected a shortlist of four for the 2024 ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing. This year's awards are sponsored by PA EDitorial.

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning session at the ALPSP Conference on 11 September. The winners will be announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 12 September in Manchester.

In this series, we hear from each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

Signals is a London-based startup, launched in December 2023, on a mission to restore trust in research. We are a team of former researchers with a deep interest in scholarly publishing and research integrity, and a proven track record of building products for publishers and researchers. Signals is already helping publishers to identify problematic articles at submission and in their portfolios. 

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards?

Signals addresses the pressing need of tackling publishing integrity issues that are eroding trust in research. These issues are difficult to detect at scale, but Signals aims to help solve this problem by providing researchers and publishers with the information they need to understand the trustworthiness and value of research articles. Our product analyses published articles, manuscripts, and entire journals, to help publishers and researchers improve their research integrity workflows and make rapid, informed decisions on articles they are working with. 

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

Signals evaluates research articles by surfacing signals from the complex networks of articles, authors, institutions, and citations, combined with signals from experts, including sleuths and researchers. 

The Signals team has deep expertise in the scholarly publishing industry. Co-founders Andrew Preston, Elliott Lumb, and Tiago Barros bring extensive experience in building products for publishers and researchers from their previous roles at Publons, PeerRef, Faculty Opinions, and Sciwheel. Lead Engineer, Florin Asăvoaie, was the Solutions Architect for Hindawi’s Phenom platform. His engineering expertise and experience in the industry are accelerating Signals’ development. Nicko Goncharoff, our Commercial Lead, has over two decades of commercial experience in STM research software and publishing. Finally, Christos Petrou, with his expertise in scholarly publishing analytics, provides Signals with invaluable contributions on developing and refining our signals.

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

Signals has a unique and innovative strategy to restore trust in research, based on these key pillars:

• Positioning: Signals is built for the entire research community. Research integrity doesn’t just affect publishers. It affects researchers, institutions, and anyone engaging with research. To restore trust in research it’s essential that everyone has access to the information they need to evaluate research.
• Network: Signals has a novel approach to evaluating research articles. By using a combination of insight from the networks of article metadata and contributions from experts, our data graph improves over time as the scholarly record grows and articles are cited and engaged with. Using this approach, our product currently flags 89% of known problematic articles.
• Transparency: Signals evaluations are transparent and actionable. We show why articles are potentially problematic and provide the necessary context to understand the basis of the evaluation. This enables individuals to make rapid and informed decisions on articles and simultaneously recognize and report false positives, enabling us to constantly improve Signals’ accuracy. 
• Trust: Signals doesn’t just flag potential issues, it also show why articles are trustworthy. This enables individuals to spend less time evaluating every article for potential issues, improving workflows.

What are your plans for the future?

We’re focused on addressing the urgent challenges faced by publishers. In the near future, we plan to extend our offering to research institutions, helping them to play a decisive role in identifying and preventing research fraud. There is a clear need to expand the use of Signals across the research ecosystem, to provide article-level insight for anyone engaging with research, including pharmaceutical companies, government, and healthcare professionals. Our goal is to amplify trustworthy, valuable research that advances our knowledge and supports progress. 

About the author

Elliott Lumb, Co-Founder, Signals.

Elliott is a Co-Founder of Signals. He has a PhD in medicinal chemistry, had several roles at Frontiers, consulted for publishers on their Open Access portfolio, and was the founder of PeerRef. 

More information

Signals.

Spotlight on: The Papermill Alarm

The judges have selected a shortlist of four for the 2024 ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing. This year's awards are sponsored by PA EDitorial.

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning session at the ALPSP Conference on 11 September. The winners will be announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 12 September in Manchester.

In this series, we hear from each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

We love working with data, but we prefer working with you. Clear Skies was founded to support publishers. We believe that a robust, healthy peer-review system is critical to the future of research integrity. Our services are designed to support the challenging work publishers do to maintain that system while limiting the risk presented by research fraud. 

This is not a "move fast and break things" startup. We believe strongly in responsible science and ethical methods. We move with care and we respect that, behind every paper (real or fake) there are real people whose careers depend on fair consideration. For that reason, we present our findings in context and use an evidence-based approach to surface actionable information. We also avoid surfacing information that might be misleading or harmful. Much like an editorial process - the value comes as much from what we don't put out as from what we do.

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards?

The Papermill Alarm

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

The Papermill Alarm is the name we give to the alerting system that sits on top of our analytics.

That gives us an early-warning system which is available as an API through a direct agreement, or via our partners at STM, Morressier, and others (to be announced). 

Sitting underneath that simple output, we have several pipelines of advanced analytics which feed into our dashboard Web Application. The dashboard surfaces important leads for investigation. What you don't see are the 50 or so different methods for detecting problematic papers that we tested and discarded. We retain only the few methods that provide genuine predictive power. Those methods include advanced AI textual analysis and network analysis. 

The system improves perpetually as new data comes in from publishers. It is self-improving and self-correcting. At this stage, the underlying data is a completely unique resource describing the papermill problem in detail across the whole industry.

The Papermill Alarm was created, built, tested, and deployed at industry-scale by Adam Day. However, around 20 individuals have contributed to Clear Skies and we have built a specialised core team over the last couple of years. We give particular thanks to Adrian Stanley whose support has been incredible. 

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

It was the first of its kind. The Papermill Alarm came to market in 2022 before there was any automated service dedicated to papermill detection. It's easy to see that this kind of scalable method is possible now, but at the time it wasn't clear and it took considerable testing and iteration to get there. From that initial market of 1, it has inspired numerous others to create their own papermill-detection services. 

What are your plans for the future?

The future is collaboration. We want to develop our team and work with everyone throughout the research community: first, to shine a light on the problem, but secondly to help tackle it as a team with an informed perspective.

Indeed, currently, we are developing our team to reach the next level. Stay tuned!

Image caption: a semantic space showing Papermill Alarm alerts for a publisher. Each dot is a paper. Red and orange regions represent areas of concern.  

About the author

Adam Day is the CEO of Clear Skies. He has a background in physics, machine-learning, journals-editorial and data science. He writes a popular blog about research integrity.

More information

Clear Skies.

 

Spotlight on: Morressier's Integrity Manager

The judges have selected a shortlist of four for the 2024 ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing. This year's awards are sponsored by PA EDitorial.

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning session at the ALPSP Conference on 11 September. The winners will be announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 12 September in Manchester.

In this series, we hear from each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

Morressier provides publishers and societies with workflows for transforming scholarly communications. We empower you through the entire publication journey, from the first spark of an idea right through to journal submission and peer-review. We offer integrity-protected workflows across the following products: Proceedings Manager, Integrity Manager, and Journal Manager. Driven by the belief that technology can help create a world in which all scientific outputs are traceable and trustworthy, Morressier is headquartered in Berlin and has offices in London and Washington DC.

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards?

Morressier’s Integrity Manager, launched in May 2023, addresses the integrity crisis in scholarly publishing with a comprehensive platform designed for detecting research fraud and managing investigations. By integrating both proprietary technology and top third-party tools, Integrity Manager effectively identifies a wide-range of issues, including plagiarism, citation misconduct, AI-generated text, image manipulation, and institution verification. This unified approach eliminates the need for publishers and societies to negotiate with multiple vendors and upload documents to various systems.

Additionally, the platform centralizes integrity investigation management, enabling users to track and analyze all investigation activities and data in one place. Integrity Manager reduces manual workload, lowers costs, and provides actionable insights through detailed reporting. By boosting trust in the scientific record and supporting early fraud detection, the platform streamlines editorial workflows, ensures high-quality publications, and minimizes costly retractions.

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

Morressier’s Integrity Manager performs a wide-range of sophisticated checks on manuscripts to ensure research integrity and streamline the editorial process. Here’s how it works:

Types of Checks

• Plagiarism Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to compare manuscripts against an extensive database of previously published works to identify potential plagiarism or paraphrasing.
• Citation Misconduct: Flags excessive self-citations or unusual citation patterns that may indicate inappropriate citation practices.
• AI-Generated Text Detection: Scans manuscripts for sections likely generated by AI, using sophisticated AI-detection tools to ensure content authenticity.
• Image Manipulation Detection: Compares images in manuscripts against a vast repository to detect potential manipulations or duplications, including zooms, flips, and cropping.
• Institution Verification: Checks for consistency and validity of institutional affiliations, helping to confirm the authenticity of authors' identities.
• Tortured Phrasing Detection: Identifies potentially problematic phrases often associated with paper mills or automated content generators.
• Flagging Cited Retracted Content: Cross-references citations with a database of retracted papers to prevent the propagation of flawed research.
• Paper Mill Alarm: Public - Scan for submissions suspiciously similar to known paper mill generated content. 

Investigation Management

Integrity Manager not only conducts these checks but also integrates them into a unified investigation management system. Here’s how the integrity management module centralizes the investigations workflow:

• Centralized Tracking: All alerts and flagged issues from the various checks are consolidated in one platform, enabling users to track and manage investigation activities.
• Streamlined Workflow: Users can access all relevant data and investigation outcomes from a single interface, reducing the complexity and administrative burden of managing multiple systems.
• Actionable Insights: The platform offers actionable insights and recommendations based on aggregated data, helping editorial teams make informed decisions and take appropriate actions.
• Historical Data Access: Maintains a record of all investigation activities and outcomes, facilitating ongoing monitoring and trend analysis to prevent future issues.

By integrating robust checks with a centralized investigation management system, Integrity Manager enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of research integrity teams.

Our team behind Integrity Manager is composed of experts in publishing, technology, data science, and research integrity, and we have over 100 years of experience in the publishing industry between us! We collaborate closely with senior leaders in the publishing industry, leveraging their insights to refine and enhance our platform continually, with new features released every 2 weeks. Our Strategic Advisory Board, established in December 2023, plays a crucial role in guiding our development efforts based on real-world needs and challenges.

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

Integrity Manager is innovative in several key ways:

• Comprehensive Integration: Integrity Manager is the only enterprise-grade solution for integrity checks on the market. 
• Integrity Investigation Management: The first independent tool on the market offering comprehensive investigation management.
• Automation and Efficiency: The platform automates many manual tasks, significantly reducing the workload for editors and reviewers while lowering costs for publishers.
• Actionable Insights: Detailed reporting and analytics provide actionable insights, enabling the development of robust research integrity policies and the identification of broader trends.
• This all-in-one approach not only streamlines the integrity management process but also enhances the effectiveness of fraud detection and investigation.

What are your plans for the future?

We are continuously expanding the capabilities of Integrity Manager to cover more aspects of research integrity and further integrate emerging technologies. We aim to provide the most sophisticated tools for detecting and preventing research fraud, including advanced verification checks for authors and institutions to enhance credibility and reduce fraud risk. We frequently refine our platform based on user feedback and industry trends. Our goal is to continue to be the leading research integrity solution in the scholarly publishing industry, setting new standards for quality and trust in academic research.

About the author

Robyn Mugridge, Sales Director, Morressier

Robyn joined Morressier as Sales Director in 2024, bringing extensive experience from several international publishers. At Morressier, Robyn plays a pivotal role in expanding partnerships and driving the adoption of innovative integrity solutions. Previously, as Head of Publishing Partnerships at Frontiers, Robyn developed a passion for collaborating with societies and modernising publishing technology. In addition, as Co-Chair of the ALPSP Education Committee, Robyn enjoys bringing publishing professionals together to tackle shared challenges in the journal publishing industry.

More information:

Morressier Research Integrity Manager. 

Spotlight on: Original Études for the Developing Conductor

This year, the judges have selected a shortlist of four for the new ALPSP Impact Award. We also invite ALPSP members to take part in the judging process before the closing date of 31 July. Vote online. 

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning presentation session at the ALPSP Conference on 13 September, with the winners announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 14 September in Manchester.

In this series, we learn more about each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

The Open Education Initiative (OEI) is a unit of the University Libraries at Virginia Tech. The University Libraries at Virginia Tech furthers the university's dedication to being a global land-grant institution and serving faculty, students, and societies across the globe. The University Libraries supports the creation and publication of scholarship that is freely accessible to all — regardless of geographical location. The OEI offers a variety of services to improve student learning and faculty teaching materials to make them increasingly: accessible, affordable, of high quality, flexible, engaging, and innovative. We collaborate with faculty, staff, and students to create innovative original and adapted works designed to meet real-world classroom needs and release them under an open license for worldwide public use: https://guides.lib.vt.edu/oer/grantees

Collaborators for this project are from University of North Carolina at Greensboro and Virginia Tech. 

• The University of North Carolina at Greensboro is a public, R2: Doctoral University in Greensboro, North Carolina, USA and one of only fifty-seven doctoral institutions recognized by the Carnegie Foundation for both higher research activity and community engagement. The university offers 85 undergraduate degrees in over 125 areas of study, as well as 74 master’s and 32 doctoral programs to approximately 20,000 students. Founded in 1891 as a college for women, the university was one of the three charter institutions of the UNC System. Today, UNC Greensboro is one of the most diverse in the state of North Carolina and a minority-serving institution with an undergraduate population of 51% ethnic minority students and 67% female students.
  
• Virginia Tech (or Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) is a public land-grant, R1: Doctoral University with its main campus in Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. Virginia Tech offers about 280 undergraduate and graduate degree programs to over 37,000 undergraduate, graduate, and professional students and is the state’s second-largest public university by enrollment. Through experiential learning, future-focused research, and an inclusive, spirited culture, Virginia Tech strives to accomplish the charge of its motto Ut Prosim (That I May Serve). Virginia Tech’s motto “Ut Prosim,” that I may serve, is a catalyst for the engagement aspects of the global land-grant university. 

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards?

Original Études for the Developing Conductor is a peer-reviewed, freely-available, and Creative Commons-licensed collection of 25 original compositions designed to enhance contemporary conducting pedagogy by amplifying the voices of composers from historically excluded groups. This resource presents original études beyond what are typically available from the Public Domain. While a print-on-demand option is available, we have worked to create a resource that is freely available and easy to navigate electronically. QR codes and hyperlinks are provided throughout the text to help digital users move around quickly and easily. It is available in multiple formats including digital PDF, print (scores only), and audio. Downloadable PDF versions are available for scores only (160+ pages) and for scores plus parts (700+ pages). 

The collection is currently the only known conducting-specific resource that contains music by a diverse group of living composers, is open-access, and is easily navigable in digital and print formats. Original Études for the Developing Conductor was published on April 27, 2023. 

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

This collection of 25 original musical scores and parts is designed for use as a supplement for conducting education at advanced undergraduate and graduate levels. Études range from thirty seconds to four minutes in length and are original compositions designed to create a unified musical narrative. Each étude has an introductory page that includes a link to a MIDI realization (MP4) of the étude, a list of the parameters of the commission, additional pedagogical opportunities identified by the editors, information about the étude and composer, and a link to the composer’s website. Études were commissioned from a group of 65 invited composers from historically excluded groups, and composed by 25 living composers according to a set of musical characteristics and pedagogical opportunities designated by the editors.

Our hope is that this book will better prepare conducting students for the musical world they are entering while also reinforcing the existing pedagogical goals of conducting teachers across the United States and beyond. Despite the fact that conducting pedagogy is continually evolving, the examples students encounter in conducting classes tend to remain the same. By meeting the needs of modern students while also celebrating the voices of a diverse cross-section of contemporary composers, we hope this book offers a significant contribution to conducting pedagogy that supports the classroom goals of any conducting teacher regardless of pedagogical approach. As a zero-cost, openly licensed supplemental text featuring the music of many composers who have been historically excluded, we hope this book addresses current pedagogical issues of equity, diversity, inclusion, and access in a meaningful way. We also hope that the way music is published and navigated within a digital environment will change as a result of this publication.

Extensive efforts have been undertaken to ensure the usability of this resource for classroom use and beyond: 

• We conducted usability testing with students based on classroom scenarios;
• The text is freely available in multiple digital formats including high and low-resolution PDFs of scores and parts, and of scores only;
• An introductory table displays musical characteristics and commissioned elements for each étude;
• Layout, design, and navigation of the text were specifically designed for ease of digital download and navigation including in-document links which enable navigation within the overall book through a linked table of contents, navigation to and within individual scores, parts, and back to the score from each part; 
• PDFs may be self-printed and are also available to order as a “scores only” spiral-bound softcover print-on-demand version;
• Links and QR codes direct digital and print users to MIDI realizations (MP4s) available via a YouTube playlist, or to the book’s main landing page;
• In the digital “scores and parts” version, links at the bottom of each cover page enable the reader to “jump to” transposed parts for their instrument, return to the linked table of contents, or visit the main landing page of the resource;
• To enable accessibility for musicians who are blind or have low vision, the text, images, and links in the PDF versions of this text are tagged structurally and include alternative text, which allows for machine readability;
• The book was professionally engraved, copyedited, and typeset. MIDI realizations (MP4) were created and are freely available via YouTube;

The twenty-five composers who accepted commissions for this work and whose names are prominently featured on the book’s cover made this possible.They include: Spencer Arias, David Biendenbender, Susan Botti, Matthew Browne, Trevor Bumgarner, Yi Chen, Brent Michael Davids, Gala Flagello, Max Grafe, Ivette Rodriguez Herryman, Jennifer Jolley, Molly Joyce, Alexis Lamb, Lynnsey Lambrecht,Shuying Li, Ricardo Lorenz, Sally Lamb McCune, Hillary Purrington, Will Rowe, Christopher Sherwood-Gabrielson, Elena Spect, Hilary Tann, and Roger Zare. 

The project leadership team includes four people: two music subject matter experts, Dr. Jonathan Caldwell of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and Dr. Derek Shapiro at Virginia Tech who served as lead editors for the project, and two members of the Open Education Initiative of the University Libraries at Virginia Tech, Anita Walz, Managing Editor, and Kindred Grey, OER and Graphic Design Specialist, who were deeply involved in project design, peer review, development, and production. Matt Browne and Artem Bank contributed music engraving and MIDI realizations to the project. 

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

Original Études for the Developing Conductor demonstrates impact and innovation in multiple ways. 

• Open-access music textbook publishing: No-cost online availability under a Creative Commons license is a significant benefit for students who more than ever struggle to afford textbooks and course materials, and as required course for music degrees, conducting is a high-need area for freely-available and openly-licensed course materials. 
• Centering students as part of project design: The project centers student needs and real-world classroom use by involving students and student-centric planning throughout the project planning process. This has resulted in innovative ways to ensure access, accessibility, relevant design, engagement, and in-document navigation, notably the use of QR codes and links to enable speedy navigation between scores, parts, and the Table of Contents, using a spiral-binding for the print version, and the inclusion of more representative composers than currently available textbooks.
• Centering diverse composers and contemporary music: Prior to initiating this project, our review of more than 250 excerpts in five prominent conducting textbooks revealed inclusion of only one woman composer and one person of color. Our text features composers from historically underrepresented groups, provides a short biographical statement, photo, link to the composer’s website, and the composer’s description of their etude. By centering a diversity of composers and contemporary music this work builds awareness of more diverse, living composers, current musical styles, and enhances engagement especially of students from historically marginalized groups.
• Prioritizing in-document navigation: Our student reviewers are so excited about the navigation in the book: “I’ve never seen this before. I wish that everyone would do this.” In class students are frequently asked to locate a score within a collection, conduct the score, play their instrument’s part and return to the score. In an analog environment this means page-turns in a 700+ page volume. In a digital environment, this necessitates scrolling or navigating to multiple files on one or more devices. Our publication leverages a linked Table of Contents to quickly navigate to any score, links from scores to each part, links from each part back to the score or Table of Contents, plus links and QR codes for print and digital users to navigate to an MP4 for each piece or to return to the full digital text. We are excited about the effectiveness of this approach for in-class use of this work and what it means for student learning. We also hope that music publishers will catch on and imitate this relevant and innovative approach.
• Proof of concept for open-access music textbook publishing. Publishing open access necessitates exploration of different financial models and creates opportunities for change and for entry of new players into the publishing space. We acknowledge the value of composers’ work by paying them in advance rather than relying on royalties and allowing retention of author rights while obtaining consent to release their work under a non-exclusive CC BY NC SA license. We reverted to a “patron pays” funding model and leverage funding carefully by maintaining a lean publishing operation. This project demonstrates that significant, real-world impacts are possible even for a small, focused team. 

What are your plans for the future?

First, we plan to use the work in the classroom this fall and evaluate our and others’ experiences of teaching and learning with the materials. We have also submitted the project for several conference presentations for which we are waiting to hear the outcome.

Second, conducting instructors and composers are already asking for a Volume 2. As this first volume focuses on intermediate to advanced-level etudes, we plan to focus on introductory-level etudes for the second volume. We hope to expand our scope beyond composers whose primary residence is in the United States.

Third, we are working with accessibility specialists to create an alt-text tagged version of each of the scores and parts to better enable access for learners who are blind or have low-vision.

Fourth, we see significant potential for music textbooks and sheet music publishing entities to innovate in the areas of open access, inclusion, and ease-of-navigation. We are discussing ideas regarding open access music publishing with colleagues, and working to get the word out regarding this proof-of-concept for open access, more inclusive, and navigable music publishing in library publishers and beyond. 

We are grateful and honoured to be selected as a finalist for ALPSP's 2023 Impact Award.

About the author

Anita Walz is Associate Professor, Assistant Director of Open Education, and Scholarly Communication Librarian in the University Libraries at Virginia Tech. She received her MS in library and information science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and has worked in university, government, school, and international libraries for over 20 years. She is the founder of the Open Education Initiative at Virginia Tech and executive and managing editor of over 20l open textbooks adapted or created at Virginia Tech, many of which may be found at: https://guides.lib.vt.edu/oer/grantees 

More information

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/conducting
• OEI website: https://guides.lib.vt.edu/oer
• Department of Music at Virginia Tech: https://sopa.vt.edu/future-students/undergraduate-programs/Music.html
• UNCG School of Music: https://vpa.uncg.edu/music

Spotlight on: Cassyni Journal Seminar Series

This year, the judges have selected a shortlist of four for the ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing 2023. We also invite ALPSP members to take part in the judging process before the closing date of 31 July. Vote online. 

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning presentation session at the ALPSP Conference on 13 September, with the winners announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 14 September in Manchester.

In this series, we learn more about each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

Cassyni is a startup launched in 2021 by the founders of Publons, Mendeley and Kopernio (now EndNote Click), we are based in London and have team members in the US and Europe. The platform was originally developed in the midst of the Covid pandemic as a way for researchers to organise, run, publish and preserve research seminars online.

Cassyni’s publisher offering is seeing rapid uptake across all fields of research and has been adopted by both commercial publishers (e.g. Elsevier, Springer Nature and Cambridge University Press) as well as society publishers (e.g. Royal Society, New Phytologist and AIAA). 

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards? 

Cassyni Journal Seminar Series is a platform for publishers to run, organise and publish online seminars in which authors talk about their latest research. It includes a suite of intuitive workflow tools making it easy for editors to convene keynote live events and author-led seminars.  

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

The Cassyni team is made up of former researchers who have extensive experience of bringing innovative products to the publisher market that have positively changed scholarly communication. The team passionately believe that research seminars are an important part of the academic lifecycle and are currently an unseen jewel. By growing a connected ecosystem around seminars it will enable a well established medium for communicating research to travel further, faster to a more inclusive global audience. 

There are 2 types of seminars in the Cassyni Journal Seminar Series, Keynote seminars and Author-led seminars. 

Keynote seminars are live online events presented by authors hand-picked by the journal editors for their outstanding research. The seminars are promoted to the journal’s audience, who can attend the event and subscribe to the series, enabling the publisher to build a community around a topic, discipline or journal. Cassyni Keynote Seminars capture the magic of an in-person seminar, with the added bonus of being able to include a more diverse and geographically dispersed audience. The ‘watch later’ functionality allows researchers in different timezones or those unable to attend live to view the recording and take part in the Q&A asynchronously. All seminar recordings are preserved in a custom branded journal seminar series page on Cassyni. 

 
Author-led Seminars are designed to be scalable and require minimal input from journal teams. Selected authors are invited to give a Cassyni seminar as part of the manuscript acceptance process through a light-touch integration with editorial management systems. Authors simply click on the Cassyni link which walks them through the self-serve seminar publishing workflow. Online seminars based on a researcher’s latest publications are a proven route to increased reach and accelerated impact, helping them disseminate their findings to new audiences and boosting research integrity. 

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

Research seminar series form the centres of communities in which academics across disciplines share and discuss the latest research. However, without dedicated workflow tools and supporting infrastructure journal publishers have not been able to engage researchers participating in these communities in a systematic and scalable way. Increasingly, researchers are seeking out online events and videos as compelling complements to published articles when consuming research. For many researchers a 30 minute seminar can be a more engaging entry point to a new topic than a 30 page manuscript. 

Seminar recordings are automatically enhanced using Cassyni’s proprietary AI technology to produce high quality transcripts, extract slides and detect and resolve references to other scholarly works contained in the talk. The enhanced recording which includes automatic hyperlinks to journal content embedded in the video and is then published with a DOI ensuring it is part of the scholarly record. Seminars that are associated with a research article are linked from Cassyni, driving engagement and traffic to the publisher website. 

 
Publishers and societies are always looking for new ways to push the boundaries of research and engage their authors and readers with value-add services. By allowing authors to give seminars associated with their publications there is a chance for the community to hear directly from the people behind the papers. With the rise of generative AI and papermills having a seminar published alongside a paper is a valuable tool to boost research integrity and increase trust in the research. 

What are your plans for the future? 

A major focus for Cassyni is connecting online seminars deeply into the wider scholarly ecosystem as first class research outputs.  Cassyni seminars are already issued with a Crossref DOI and so are discoverable wherever Crossref is indexed. There are imminent plans to integrate with a multitude of research tools and discovery platforms so watch this space!

About the author

Ben Kaube co-founded Cassyni to help researchers disseminate their work through seminars and video. Prior to Cassyni he founded one-click research access tool Kopernio (now EndNote Click, acquired by Clarivate) and Newsflo (acquired by Elsevier). Ben holds a PhD in physics from Imperial College London and was named a Forbes “30 Under 30” for Science and Healthcare in 2020.

More information

Cassyni: https://cassyni.com/

Spotlight on: Bilingualism from submission to publication from Medwave and Kriyadocs

This year, the judges have selected a shortlist of four for the ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing 2023. We also invite ALPSP members to take part in the judging process before the closing date of 31 July. Vote online. 

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning presentation session at the ALPSP Conference on 13 September, with the winners announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 14 September in Manchester.

In this series, we learn more about each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

Medwave is a bilingual, open-access, MEDLINE-included medical journal founded by Dr. Vivienne C. Bachelet in 2001. Its mission is to elevate clinical professional standards in the region by facilitating access, overcoming geographical and economic barriers, and improving the quality of scientific reporting and research.

Kriyadocs is an ecosystem for scholarly publishers that offers technology-led solutions and services to streamline publishing workflows from submission to distribution for global academic, professional, and scholarly publishers.

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards?

As a design partner, Medwave collaborated with Kriyadocs to establish a fully bilingual peer review and production platform capable of handling submissions in both Spanish and English. The platform includes comprehensive Spanish copyediting and English translation stages to ensure consistency throughout the publication process.

This submission is based on the Learned Publishing article titled "A technology-based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication" by Dr. Vivienne C. Bachelet and Dr. Máximo Rousseau Portalis (Bachelet & Rousseau-Portalis, 2023*).

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

Kriyadocs' online submission system manages peer review in the journal's source language and seamlessly transitions to the copyediting, typesetting, and proof-checking module. A modification was programmed by the Kriyadocs team to handle production processes for both the source language and its translated version.

Salient features of the workflow that enable and enhance the fully bilingual journal publication include:

• An online submission system that is capable of handling peer review in the journal’s source language.
• A smooth transition from the peer review process to production—including copyediting, typesetting, and proof checking, with an XML-first approach.
• The use of AI-based tools, such as DeepL for language translation and Grammarly for content editing, by Medwave editors to produce error-free translations with speed, efficiency, and lower costs.
• Fully automated PDF and JATS XML files for publication, as well as deposits to third-party preservation and archiving platforms.
• Automated recycling of non-translatable sections reduces inconsistencies between original and translated versions of articles.
• Simultaneous publication of both Spanish and English versions of the journal.

The ACTIVE platform, available as an open source software, generates the fully bilingual website for the journal. The website has been set up such that it transitions seamlessly between the Spanish and English interfaces.

After the implementation of this intervention, the journal was able to offer full bilingualism for manuscripts submitted in Spanish and ensure the simultaneous publication of Spanish and English articles with no delays between versions.

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

A bilingual journal enables the dissemination of research to a larger audience while preserving the local language and locally-generated knowledge, as Dr. Bachelet presented at the Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication. However, this can be a cost- and resource-intensive endeavor.

Dr. Vivienne C. Bachelet and Ravi Venkataramani at 9th Peer Review Congress

This collaboration is significant and innovative because it established a fully bilingual peer review and production platform capable of handling submissions in both Spanish and English. This solution not only empowers authors to submit their articles in their native language but also broadens the pool of potential reviewers by enabling peer review to be conducted in the same language. The platform streamlines the publication process and enables the simultaneous publication of original and translated articles with no compromise in quality.

This solution offers numerous advantages to enhance Medwave’s publication process.

• It reduces inconsistencies between the original and translated versions of articles and eases the burden on human translators by automatically recycling non-translatable sections such as metadata, abstracts, keywords, and references.
• It has also led to increased efficiencies in the publication process, resulting in shorter review rounds, fewer human errors, and full automation of PDF typesetting and XML JATS files for publication, database deposits, and third-party preservation archiving. 
• In 2019, there was a gap of 31 days between the publication of the original Spanish article and its translated version. The bilingual workflow has eliminated the gap and enabled the simultaneous publication of both versions of the article. 
• As a result of the streamlined journal publication setup, Medwave has been able to remain financially sustainable.

By implementing a bilingual journal workflow and successfully addressing the challenges previously faced by the journal, this collaboration supports Medwave’s vision of increasing the dissemination of research to a wider audience. A bilingual journal workflow promotes inclusivity within the scientific community by providing equal access to research for researchers who may not be fluent in English. By enabling researchers and healthcare professionals to access medical research in both English and Spanish, this workflow eliminates language barriers within the scientific community and promotes cross-cultural exchange and understanding. It also encourages greater collaboration between researchers and healthcare professionals from different countries and language backgrounds, fostering diverse perspectives and innovative solutions to medical problems.

Finally, it can help increase the visibility and impact of research by reaching a larger audience, leading to more citations and recognition within the scientific community.

What are your plans for the future?

The future possibilities of expanding a bilingual journal workflow are vast and exciting. With the world becoming increasingly interconnected, there is a growing demand for research to be accessible in multiple languages. 

By expanding a bilingual journal workflow to include more languages, such as Chinese, Arabic, and F
rench, researchers are empowered to write in their native language and have their voices heard in the scholarly community. A multilingual journal workflow has the potential to enhance the visibility and impact of research by reaching an even wider audience. This can lead to more citations and recognition within the scientific community, as well as increased funding opportunities for researchers. Furthermore, expanding a bilingual journal workflow can help to promote inclusivity and diversity within the scientific community, as it ensures that researchers from all language backgrounds have access to the same research, leading to greater collaboration and innovation within the scientific community. 

The benefits and opportunities of expanding a bilingual journal workflow are immense and hold great promise for the future of research.

About the authors

Ravi Venkataramani, CEO of Kriyadocs, drives collaborative partnerships to enhance human potential through technology. Guided by his visionary leadership, Kriyadocs aims to revolutionize scholarly publishing with innovative solutions for researchers.

Dr. Vivienne C. Bachelet, Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Medwave, launched the bilingual biomedical journal to bridge the education gap for Spanish-speaking clinicians, researchers, and academics in Chile. She is also an Associate Professor at the School of Medicine of the University of Santiago de Chile (USACH) and active member of prestigious medical organizations.

More information

Medwave website: https://www.medwave.cl/

Kriyadocs website: https://www.kriyadocs.com/

Kriyadocs LinkedIn: https://in.linkedin.com/company/kriyadocs

Kriyadocs Twitter: @Kriyadocs 

Medwave Twitter: @Medwave_cl 

Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication poster, “A Technology-Based, Quality Improvement Intervention to Ensure Accuracy and Integrity of the Scholarly Record of Articles Published Simultaneously in 2 Languages” by Dr. Vivienne C. Bachelet, Amaya Goyenechea, Máximo Rousseau-Portalis https://peerreviewcongress.org/peer-review-congress-2022-program/.

References

*Bachelet, V., & Rousseau-Portalis, M. (2023). A technology-based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication. Learned Publishing, 36(1), 73-80. 10.1002/leap.1533

Spotlight on: BMJ Impact Analytics

This year, the judges have selected a shortlist of four for the ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing 2023. We also invite ALPSP members to take part in the judging process before the closing date of 31 July. Vote online. 

The finalists will be showcased in a lightning presentation session at the ALPSP Conference on 13 September, with the winners announced at the ALPSP Conference Awards Dinner on 14 September in Manchester.

In this series, we learn more about each of the finalists.

Tell us about your organization

As a global healthcare knowledge provider with a vision for a healthier world, BMJ publishes one of the world’s top five most cited general medical journals, The BMJ, and over 65 specialty journals. BMJ also offers digital professional development courses and clinical decision support tools to help health professionals improve the quality of healthcare delivery. 

What is the project/product that you submitted for the Awards?

BMJ Impact Analytics is the first impact tool focused on health and social care. Developed in collaboration with Overton, BMJ Impact Analytics makes it easy to find, track, and share the real-world impact of health and medical research. It uniquely shows direct links to patient outcomes (decision support tools) and provides citations in context.

Tell us a little about how it works and the team behind it

Research that improves patients' lives matters deeply to the funders, institutions and researchers but is time-consuming and difficult to track. Traditional scholarly metrics were used to evaluate the impact of this research in the absence of more targeted analysis that specifically relates to health improvement. 

BMJ Impact Analytics was created after extensive engagement and research with medical departments, researchers and funders. It was developed in collaboration with pioneering technology start-up Overton, whose mission is to support evidence-based decision-making worldwide by tracking the reach and impact of research in policy. Our co-development combines BMJ's health expertise with Overton's data knowledge to address the challenge of finding evidence of their real-world impact of health and medical research. Funders, institutions, and researchers can now effectively find evidence of their influence; by tracking where their research is cited in clinical guidance and health policy worldwide.

In what ways do you think it demonstrates innovation?

• BMJ Impact Analytics is the only impact tool created in collaboration with medical departments, researchers and funders, specifically addressing the needs of the medical research community. 
• It is the most up-to-date and comprehensive tool available to track and share the real-world impact of medical and health research. 
• Strengthened by continuous feedback from medical departments, researchers and funders, this powerful tool encompasses the broadest range of the best available medical sources worldwide, including local guidelines and decision-support tools used by healthcare professionals at the point of care.
• BMJ Impact Analytics uses modern technology and machine learning to help discover evidence of impact,  provides context on how research was used and uniquely shows where research is making a difference closest to the patient. 

What are your plans for the future?

Since launching earlier this year, we have been delighted with how the health and medical research communities have received BMJ Impact Analytics. We will continue to work closely with these groups as part of our user-centred approach to developing and prioritising new features on the roadmap. 

About the author

Michelle Phillips is the Open Research Product Manager at BMJ. With over 15 years of publishing experience, she is passionate about real-world impact. She has been very fortunate to have collaborated with many inspiring researchers on bridging the gap between research, policy and, ultimately, real-world outcomes.

More information:

Website: https://impactanalytics.bmj.com/

Twitter: @bmj_company