Friday, 15 November 2013

'Scientifically sound' What does that mean in peer review? Cameron Neylon asks...

›
Cameron Neylon , Director of Advocacy at the Public Library of Science , challenged the audience at The Future of Peer Review seminar. ...
Wednesday, 13 November 2013

Ulrich Pöschl on advancing post-publication and public peer review

›
Ulrich Pöschl Ulrich Pöschl is based at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and is professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University...
Tuesday, 12 November 2013

Why is peer review is such an enduring factor in the research process? Mark Ware provides an overview

›
Mark Ware: why is peer review an enduring factor? Mark Ware, author of the Publishing Research Consortium's report Peer Review: An I...

The peer review landscape – what do researchers think? Adrian Mulligan reflects on Elsevier's own research.

›
Adrian Mulligan ponders: what do researchers think? What do researchers think? Peer review is slow. Generally in STM journals, average...
Friday, 8 November 2013

Copyright – business or moral right?

›
Pippa Smart: is copyright a business or moral right? Pippa Smart , Editor of ALPSP Alert and publishing consultant reflects on copyrigh...
2 comments:
Thursday, 7 November 2013

Keeping pace with changes in eJournal technology

›
Tracy Gardner: keeping pace with eJournal technology eJournal technology is an essential part of the scholarly publishing industry. It i...
Thursday, 31 October 2013

Roy Kaufman: Open Access Doesn't Necessarily Mean Free

›
Roy Kaufman, Managing Director of New Ventures at Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), writes here in a guest post about the real cost of o...
3 comments: